I just finished a fascinating book by Robert Kaplan, The Ends of the Earth, about his travels to places I probably will never go, like West Africa and Central Asia and Cambodia. Some of the more interesting things I learned are:
- that nation-states only exist on paper in much of the world, such as in much of West Africa where governments and national unity are weak and borders inconsequential. It’s sourly amusing that Sierra Leone is currently Hollywood’s favorite codeword for violent African sh*thole with both Blood Diamond and Lord of War set there.
- that Samuel Huntington got it wrong about civilizations clashing on religious lines. In much of the world, it is rather on ethnic and tribal lines that they clash. In the Caucasus, Shiite Azeri Turks see themselves more as Turks than as Muslims and are hostile to Shiite Iranians, who side with Christian Armenians, who themselves see the Azeris as Turks and therefore related to the same Turks who perpetrated the Armenian genocide of 1915.
- that the word Turk comes from the Chinese tu-kiu. What a rich and diverse history these people have, spread as they are from Turkey to Central Asia to Western China to Mongolia and Korea, and as the inheritors of Greco-Roman traditions during the days of the Byzantine Empire.
- that if I were religious, I would probably be a Sufi.
But the most interesting thing I read today was this:
“Culture is renewed when people from the city, with intellectual resources, settle in the villages.” … [That] is the lesson that the shah of Iran and other third world despots never learned: that the village, not the city, is the key to modernity; that a nation cannot be modern while its villages are still medieval.
He is talking about how cultural-religious conservatives were able to hijack Iran’s trajectory of modernization because modernity had spread too unevenly among its people. It is the same challenge that faces India, where water scarcity and religious violence and vestiges of the caste system weigh on the villages even as the cities produces computer programmers aplenty. And that faces China, where the villagers in many parts are as poor as they were 20 years ago and still suffer the corruption of the same local officials even as their country becomes an economic powerhouse.
Ever since I took that class with Abbas Milani, I have believed that how successfully a people embraces modernity is the single most important question they face. With a modern culture, they shed feudal allegiances and grudges, begin to think of themselves as united people, educate themselves and build strong economies, and generally take responsibility for their own national fates. Without it, they slide into fundamentalism, insularity, and factionalism.